Marik to CMS
EMCrit by Scott Weingart.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2oJTTVK
Marik to CMS
EMCrit by Scott Weingart.
Marik to CMS
EMCrit by Scott Weingart.
Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) is a useful tool in evaluating patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute dyspnea. Prior work has shown that right ventricular (RV) dilation is associated with repeat hospitalizations and shorter life expectancy. Traditionally, RV assessment has been evaluated by cardiologist-interpreted comprehensive echocardiography. The primary goal of this study was to determine the interrater reliability between emergency physicians (EPs) and a cardiologist for determining RV dilation on FOCUS performed on ED patients with acute dyspnea.
Prospective, observational study at two urban academic EDs; patients were enrolled if they had acute dyspnea and a computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram without acute disease. All patients had an EP-performed FOCUS to assess for RV dilation. RV dilation was defined as an RV to left ventricular ratio greater than 1. FOCUS interpretations were compared to a blinded cardiologist FOCUS interpretation using agreement and kappa statistics.
Of 84 FOCUS examinations performed on 83 patients, 17% had RV dilation. Agreement and kappa, for EP-performed FOCUS for RV dilation were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80-95%) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.48-0.88), respectively.
EP sonographers are able to detect RV dilation with good agreement when compared to cardiology. These results support the wider use of EP-performed FOCUS to evaluate for RV dilation in dyspneic ED patients.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Making diagnostic and therapeutic decisions is a critical activity among physicians. It relies on the ability of physicians to use cognitive processes and specific knowledge in the context of a clinical reasoning. This ability is a core competency in physicians, especially in the field of emergency medicine where the rate of diagnostic errors is high. Studies that explore medical decision-making in an authentic setting are increasing significantly. They are based on the use of qualitative methods which are applied at two separate times: 1) a video recording of the subject's actual activity in an authentic setting and 2) an interview with the subject, supported by the video recording. Traditionally, activity is recorded from an “external perspective”, i.e. a camera is positioned in the room in which the consultation takes place. This approach has many limits, both technical and with respect to the validity of the data collected.
The article aims at 1) describing how decision-making is currently being studied, especially from a qualitative standpoint, and the reasons why new methods are needed, and 2) reporting how we used an original, innovative approach to study decision-making in the field of emergency medicine and findings from these studies to guide further the use of this method. The method consists in recording the subject's activity from his own-point-of-view, by fixing a microcamera on his temple or the branch of his glasses. An interview is then held on the basis of this recording, so that the subject being interviewed can relive the situation, in order to facilitate the explanation of his reasoning with respect to his decisions and actions.
We describe how this method has been used successfully in investigating medical decision-making in emergency medicine. We provide details on how to use it optimally, taking into account the constraints associated with the practice of emergency medicine, and the benefits in the study of clinical reasoning. The ‘own-point-of-view’ video technique is a promising method to study clinical decision-making in emergency medicine. It is a powerful tool to stimulate recall and help physicians make their reasoning explicit, thanks to a greater psychological immersion.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Disaster medicine has emerged as a critical discipline within emergency medicine in recent years. Mass casualty incidents and large{\hyphen}scale environmental events have shed light on the need for more formalized disaster medicine curricula and structured response plans. Koenig and Schultz’ Disaster Medicine: Comprehensive Principles and Practices, 2ndedition lives up to its title yet again and delivers in{\hyphen}depth, evidence{\hyphen}based recommendations for healthcare providers, educators, and administrators working in disaster management.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
More on rocketamine...
EMCrit by Scott Weingart.
More on rocketamine...
EMCrit by Scott Weingart.
Background: Devil in the details Airway management is a detail-oriented sport. Minor nuances of patient positioning can be essential. Or gentle laryngeal manipulation. Apneic oxygenation can improve first-pass success. Placing the pulse oximeter on the same arm as the blood pressure cuff can cause real headache. Failure to recognize and remove dentures is an enormous […]
EMCrit by Josh Farkas.
Background: Devil in the details Airway management is a detail-oriented sport. Minor nuances of patient positioning can be essential. Or gentle laryngeal manipulation. Apneic oxygenation can improve first-pass success. Placing the pulse oximeter on the same arm as the blood pressure cuff can cause real headache. Failure to recognize and remove dentures is an enormous […]
EMCrit by Josh Farkas.