BACKGROUND: Pancreatic or peripancreatic tissue necrosis confers substantial morbidity and mortality. New modalities have created a wide variation in approaches and timing of interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis. As acute care surgery evolves, its practitioners are increasingly being called upon to manage these complex patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database using PubMed was performed. English language articles regarding pancreatic necrosis from 1980 to 2014 were included. Letters to the editor, case reports, book chapters, and review articles were excluded. Topics of investigation included operative timing, the use of adjuvant therapy and the type of operative repair. GRADE methodology was applied to question development, outcome prioritization, evidence quality assessments, and recommendation creation. RESULTS: 88 studies were included and underwent full review. Increasing the time to surgical intervention had an improved outcome in each of the time periods evaluated (72 hours, 12-14, 30 days) with a significant improvement in outcomes if surgery was delayed 30 days. The use of percutaneous and endoscopic procedures were shown to postpone surgery and potentially be definitive. The use of minimally invasive surgery for debridement and drainage has been shown to be safe and associated with reduce morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: Acute Care Surgeons are uniquely trained to care for those with pancreatic necrosis due their training in critical care and complex surgery with ongoing shock. In adult patients with pancreatic necrosis, we recommend that pancreatic necrosectomy be delayed until at least day 12. During the first 30 days of symptoms with infected necrotic collections, we conditionally recommend surgical debridement only if the patients fail to improve after radiologic or endoscopic drainage. Finally, even with documented infected necrosis, we recommend that patients undergo a step-up approach to surgical intervention as the preferred surgical approach. Level of Evidence: Systematic review/guideline, level III (C) 2017 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2qoxutA
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Purpose Limited data are available on the relationship between treatment agents and sagittal balance in ankylosing spondylitis ...
-
Abstract The global incidence of very intense cyclones has increased in recent decades with climate projections signaling that this trend ...
-
No abstract available from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2iguS27
-
Background Traumatic diaphragm injuries (TDI) pose both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in both the acute and chronic phases. There ar...
-
Objective: To evaluate the effect of routine use of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) on the diagnosis r...
-
Introduction Advancing age is a strong risk factor for adverse outcomes across multiple disease processes. However, septic surgical and trau...
-
Objectives: To review women’s participation as faculty at five critical care conferences over 7 years. Design: Retrospective analysis of fiv...
-
Objectives: To develop and validate an abbreviated version of the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire that can be used by patients as part of s...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου