BACKGROUND: Pancreatic or peripancreatic tissue necrosis confers substantial morbidity and mortality. New modalities have created a wide variation in approaches and timing of interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis. As acute care surgery evolves, its practitioners are increasingly being called upon to manage these complex patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database using PubMed was performed. English language articles regarding pancreatic necrosis from 1980 to 2014 were included. Letters to the editor, case reports, book chapters, and review articles were excluded. Topics of investigation included operative timing, the use of adjuvant therapy and the type of operative repair. GRADE methodology was applied to question development, outcome prioritization, evidence quality assessments, and recommendation creation. RESULTS: 88 studies were included and underwent full review. Increasing the time to surgical intervention had an improved outcome in each of the time periods evaluated (72 hours, 12-14, 30 days) with a significant improvement in outcomes if surgery was delayed 30 days. The use of percutaneous and endoscopic procedures were shown to postpone surgery and potentially be definitive. The use of minimally invasive surgery for debridement and drainage has been shown to be safe and associated with reduce morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: Acute Care Surgeons are uniquely trained to care for those with pancreatic necrosis due their training in critical care and complex surgery with ongoing shock. In adult patients with pancreatic necrosis, we recommend that pancreatic necrosectomy be delayed until at least day 12. During the first 30 days of symptoms with infected necrotic collections, we conditionally recommend surgical debridement only if the patients fail to improve after radiologic or endoscopic drainage. Finally, even with documented infected necrosis, we recommend that patients undergo a step-up approach to surgical intervention as the preferred surgical approach. Level of Evidence: Systematic review/guideline, level III (C) 2017 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2qoxutA
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
LAKE MARY FIRE DEPARTMENT 911 WALLACE COURT LAKE MARY, FLORIDA 32746 Updated: May 04, 2016 Job Classification: Firefighter/Paramedic The Lak...
-
Abstract Purpose of Review Evaluation and treatment of injuries to the neck has received a lot of attention over the past 20 years. New ...
-
Abstract Our goal was to reconstruct soil recovery from Acid Rain based upon removal of stemflow at beech ( Fagus sylvatica ) stands of kn...
-
Introduction The Rothman Index (RI) is an objective measurement of a patient’s overall condition, automatically generated from 26 variables ...
-
Correction to: Plea for a standardized imaging approach to disorders of sex development in neonates: Consensus proposal from European Societ...
-
Abstract Objective A national debate is underway about the value of key provisions within the adult-oriented Affordable Care Act (ACA)—th...
-
Influence of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Continuous Training on Functional Capacity in Individuals With Heart Failure: A SYSTEMA...
-
Abstract The lung tissue contains a heterogeneous milieu of bronchioles, epithelial, airway smooth muscle (ASM), alveolar, and immune cell...
-
Abstract In this study, Streptococcus macedonicus ( S . macedonicus ) strains were identified from Algerian traditional fermented milks (...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου