Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Versus Reflective Debriefing for Pediatric Septic Shock Training

Objectives: Rapid cycle deliberate practice is a simulation training method that cycles between deliberate practice and directed feedback to create perfect practice; in contrast to reflective debriefing where learners are asked to reflect on their performance to create change. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of rapid cycle deliberate practice versus reflective debriefing training on resident application and retention of the pediatric sepsis algorithm. Design: Prospective, randomized-control study. Setting: A tertiary care university children’s hospital simulation room, featuring a high-fidelity pediatric patient simulator. Subjects: Forty-six upper-level pediatric residents. Interventions: Simulation training using rapid cycle deliberate practice or reflective debriefing. Measurements and Main Results: Knowledge was assessed with a quiz on core sepsis management topics. The application of knowledge was assessed with a sepsis management checklist during the simulated scenario. The residents were assessed before and after the intervention and again at a follow-up session, 3–4 months later, to evaluate retention. Both groups had similar pre-intervention scores. Post-intervention, the rapid cycle deliberate practice group had higher checklist scores (rapid cycle deliberate practice 18 points [interquartile range, 18–19] vs reflective debriefing 17 points [interquartile range, 15–18]; p

from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2t0n7PN