Introduction Surgeons perform emergent exploratory laparotomies (ex-laps) for a myriad of surgical diagnoses. We characterized common diagnoses for which emergent ex-laps were performed and leveraged these groups to improve risk-adjustment models for postoperative mortality. Methods Using American Association for the Surgery of Trauma criteria, we identified hospitalizations where the primary procedure was an emergent ex-lap in the 2012-2014 (derivation cohort) and 2015 (validation cohort) Nationwide Inpatient Sample. After tabulating all ICD-9 diagnosis codes within these hospitalizations, we divided them into clinically-relevant groups. Using two stepwise regression paradigms – forward selection and backwards elimination – we identified diagnostic groups significantly associated with postoperative mortality in multivariable logistic regressions. We evaluated the addition of these groups as individual covariates in risk-adjustment models for postoperative mortality using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC). All regressions additionally adjusted for clinical factors and hospital clustering. Results We identified 4127 patients in the derivation cohort (median age: 50 years, 46.0% female, 62.1% white), with an overall mortality rate of 13.4%. Among all patients, we tabulated a total of 164 diagnosis codes, of which 27 (16.5%) may have led to an emergent ex-lap. These 27 codes clinically represented seven diagnostic categories, which captured a majority of the patients (70.4%). Backwards elimination and forward selection led to four common diagnosis categories associated with mortality: bleeding, obstruction, shock, and ischemia. Adjusting for these four diagnostic groups in a multivariable logistic regression assessing postoperative mortality increased the AUROC from 74.5% to 88.2% in the derivation cohort and from 73.8% to 88.2% in the validation cohort. Conclusion Seven diagnostic groups account for the majority of the emergent ex-laps. Adjusting for four groups may improve the accuracy of risk-adjustment models for mortality and validating such analytic standardization may optimize best research practices for EGS procedures. Evidence Level III, Prognostic and Epidemiologic Corresponding author: Joseph V. Sakran, MD, MPH, MPA, Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, Sheikh Zayed Tower, Suite 6107, Baltimore, MD 21287, Tel: 410-955-2244. Fax: 410-955-1884. Email: jsakran1@jhmi.edu © 2018 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2CRm9vr
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
By Jay Fitch, PhD Our profession has become preoccupied with millennials over the last few years. The number of magazine articles, conferenc...
-
The recommendations are accompanied by performance goals to measure successful implementation by first responders. from EMS via xlomafota1...
-
Older patients who present to the emergency department frequently have acute or chronic alterations of their mental status, including their ...
-
Abstract Purpose of Review Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis is a relatively common end-organ infectious complication in immunocompromised h...
-
Abstract We aimed to investigate the relationship between time to positivity (TTP) of blood cultures and clinical outcomes in children wit...
-
Clinical Research in Cardiology from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2k8IquQ
-
Background: The objectives of this study were to assess current variability in management preferences for blunt trauma patients with pericar...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου