Background There are no clear guidelines for the best test or combination of tests to identify traumatic rectal injuries. We hypothesize that computed tomography (CT) and rigid proctoscopy (RP) will identify all injuries. Methods American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional retrospective study (2004-2015) of patients who sustained a traumatic rectal injury. Patients with known rectal injuries who underwent both CT and RP as part of their diagnostic workup were included. Only patients with full thickness injuries (AAST grade II-V) were included. CT findings of rectal injury, perirectal stranding, or rectal wall thickening and RP findings of blood, mucosal abnormalities, or laceration were considered positive. Results 106 patients were identified. Mean age was 32 years, 85(79%) were male, and 67(63%) involved penetrating mechanisms. A total of 36 (34%) and 100 (94%) patients had positive CT and RP findings, respectively. Only 3 (3%) patients had both a negative CT and negative RP. On further review, each of these three patients had intraperitoneal injuries and had indirect evidence of rectal injury on CT scan including pneumoperitoneum or sacral fracture. Conclusion As stand-alone tests, neither CT nor RP can adequately identify traumatic rectal injuries. However, the combination of both test demonstrates a sensitivity of 97%. Intraperitoneal injuries may be missed by both CT and RP, so patients with a high index of suspicion and/or indirect evidence of rectal injury on CT scan may necessitate laparotomy for definitive diagnosis. Level of evidence IV, diagnostic Corresponding Author: Marc D. Trust MD, Clinical Instructor, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Seton Medical Center at The University of Texas at Austin, 1500 Red River St, Brackenridge Annex 301, Austin, TX 78701, Phone: (512) 324 – 8470, Fax: (512) 324 – 8471, mdtrust@ascension.org Presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Western Trauma Association, February 25th – March 2nd, 2018, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada. We have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose. © 2018 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2p3tQ9Z
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2s8OJAu
-
Abstract Purpose Assessment of hemodynamics is crucial for the evaluation of major trauma patients. Cardiac output (CO) monitoring provide...
-
Abstract Background Gliomas with 1p/19q-codeletion as well as mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH ) 1 are typically characteriz...
-
Abstract Deep learning has caused a third boom of artificial intelligence and great changes of diagnostic medical imaging systems such as ...
-
Abstract Objective Therapeutic lateral neck dissection (ND) is recommended for N1b papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), while prophylactic...
-
Abstract Purpose To identify predictive factors for local control of locally advanced esophageal cancer by chemoradiotherapy, the relati...
-
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2jXwFbF
-
Dr. Scott Weiner’s PreManage ED project aims to coordinate better care for “high risk and complex patients” who regularly visit several ERs ...
-
Abstract Background We evaluated our results of lengthening of free vascularized fibular grafts using a unilateral external fixator in p...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου