Objectives: Tight glycemic control using intermittent blood glucose measurements is associated with a risk of hypoglycemia. Glucose concentrations can now be measured near continuously (every 5–15 min). We assessed the quality and safety of glycemic control guided by a near-continuous glucose monitoring system in ICU patients. Design: Prospective, cluster-randomized, crossover study. Setting: Thirty-five–bed medico-surgical department of intensive care with four separate ICUs. Patients: Adult patients admitted to the department and expected to stay for at least 3 days were considered for inclusion if they had persistent hyperglycemia (blood glucose > 150 mg/dL) up to 6 hours after admission and/or were receiving insulin therapy. Interventions: A peripheral venous catheter was inserted in all patients and connected to a continuous glucose monitoring sensor (GlucoClear; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). The four ICUs were randomized in pairs in a crossover design to glycemic control using unblinded or blinded continuous glucose monitoring monitors. The insulin infusion rate was adjusted to keep blood glucose between 90 and 150 mg/dL using the blood glucose values displayed on the continuous glucose monitor (continuous glucose monitoring group—unblinded units) or according to intermittent blood glucose readings (intermittent glucose monitoring group—blinded units). Measurements and Main Results: The quality and safety of glycemic control were assessed using the proportion of time in range, the frequency of blood glucose less than 70 mg/dL, and the time spent with blood glucose less than 70 mg/dL (TB70), using blood glucose values measured by the continuous glucose monitoring device. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled: 39 in the continuous glucose monitoring group and 38 in the intermittent glucose monitoring group. A total of 43,107 blood glucose values were recorded. The time in range was similar in the two groups. The incidence of hypoglycemia (8/39 [20.5%] vs 15/38 [39.5%]) and the TB70 (0.4% ± 0.9% vs 1.6% ± 3.4%; p
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2Hhqurk
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
EDITORIAL Pediatric retina: A challenging yet fascinating field p. 179 Wei-Chi Wu DOI :10.4103/tjo.tjo_123_18 [HTML Full text] [PDF] ...
-
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis MDPI CancersCancers, Vol. 12, Pages 279: Metabolism of Estrogens: Turnover Differs Between Platinum-...
-
Abstract The aim of many breeding programs for the conservation of genetic biodiversity is to preserve the genetic resources of wild speci...
-
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Αλέξανδρος Γ. Σφακιανάκης Anaphylaxis Refractory to intra‐muscular adrenaline Anaphylaxis Refractory ...
-
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis , Cancer ScienceMdm2 – open questionsAbstract The Mdm2 oncoprotein and its association with p53 were...
-
Helicobacter pylori infection and gastrointestinal tract cancer biology: considering a double-edged sword reflection Adult stem cells at wor...
-
# Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182, High level MYC amplification in B-ce...
-
Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE,http://www.jove.com/ Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback... Journal of visualized experiments : J...
-
H2S can also protect nerve cells. The objective of the study is to investigate the effects of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) on the expressions of b...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου