Objectives: The outcomes of critically ill patients who undergo interhospital transfer are not well understood. Physicians assume that patients who undergo interhospital transfer will receive more advanced care that may translate into decreased morbidity or mortality relative to a similar patient who is not transferred. However, there is little empirical evidence to support this assumption. We examined country-level U.S. data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database to examine whether, in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis, interhospital transfer is associated with a mortality benefit. Design: Retrospective data analysis using complex survey design regression methods with propensity score matching. Setting: The Nationwide Readmissions Database contains information about hospital admissions from 22 States, accounting for roughly half of U.S. hospitalizations; the database contains linkage numbers so that admissions and transfers for the same patient can be linked across 1 year of follow-up. Patients: From the 2013 Nationwide Readmission Database Sample, 14,325,172 hospital admissions were analyzed. There were 61,493 patients with sepsis and on mechanical ventilation. Of these, 1,630 patients (2.7%) were transferred during their hospitalization. A propensity-matched cohort of 1,630 patients who did not undergo interhospital transfer was identified. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The exposure of interest was interhospital transfer to an acute care facility. The primary outcome was hospital mortality; the secondary outcome was hospital length of stay. The propensity score included age, gender, insurance coverage, do not resuscitate status, use of renal replacement therapy, presence of shock, and Elixhauser comorbidities index. After propensity matching, interhospital transfer was not associated with a difference in in-hospital mortality (12.3% interhospital transfer vs 12.7% non–interhospital transfer; p = 0.74). However, interhospital transfer was associated with a longer total hospital length of stay (12.8 d interquartile range, 7.7–21.6 for interhospital transfer vs 9.1 d interquartile range, 5.1–17.0 for non–interhospital transfer; p
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2yNS4LN
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Background To investigate the relationships between sagittal parameters and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores follo...
-
Objectives: To compare the performance of critical care providers with that of electroencephalography experts in identifying seizures using ...
-
Objectives: To describe the regionality and seasonality of respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospital and ICU admissions for 10 consecu...
-
Abstract Chronic exposure to high altitude may lead to hyperuricemia. We investigated the prevalence of hyperuricemia and its risk factors...
-
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death among trauma patients. Patients under antithrombotic therapy (ATT) carry an incre...
-
Abstract Background and Objective In England, the uptake of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillat...
-
Background Pulmonary contusion is a common injury that often results in priming for exaggerated inflammatory responses to a second hit. Prev...
-
ABSTRACTBackgroundEarly treatment with valproic acid (VPA) has demonstrated benefit in pre-clinical models of traumatic brain injury (TBI), ...
-
Annals of Vascular Surgery from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2oHXHVR
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου