Background: Temporary abdominal closure (TAC) following damage control surgery (DCS) for injured patients has been generalized to septic patients. However, direct comparisons between these populations are lacking. We hypothesized that patients with intra-abdominal sepsis would have different resuscitation requirements and lower primary fascial closure rates than trauma patients. Study Design: We performed a three year retrospective cohort analysis of patients managed with TAC for trauma (n=77) or intra-abdominal sepsis (n=147). All patients received negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) TAC with intention for planned relaparotomy and sequential abdominal closure attempts at 24-48 hour intervals. Results: At presentation, trauma patients had higher rates of hypothermia (31% vs. 18%), severe acidosis (27% vs. 14%), and coagulopathy (68% vs. 48%), and septic patients had higher vasopressor infusion rates (46% vs. 27%). Forty-eight hours after presentation, septic patients had persistently higher vasopressor infusion rates (37% vs. 17%), and trauma patients had received more red blood cell transfusions (6.0 vs. 0.0 units), fresh frozen plasma (5.0 vs. 0.0 units), and crystalloid (8,290 vs. 7,159 ml). Among patients surviving to discharge, trauma patients had higher primary fascial closure (PFC) rates (90% vs. 76%). For trauma patients, independent predictors of failure to achieve PCF were >=2.5 L NPWT output at 48 hours, >=10 L crystalloid administration at 48 hours, and >=10 U PRBC+FFP at 48 hours. For septic patients, relaparotomy within 48 hours predicted successful PFC; requirement for >=3 diagnostic/therapeutic laparotomies predicted failure to achieve PFC. Conclusions: Traumatic injury and intra-abdominal sepsis are associated with distinct pathophysiologic insults, resuscitation requirements, and outcomes. Failure to achieve primary fascial closure in trauma patients was attributable to the triad of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy; failure to achieve fascial closure in septic patients was dependent upon operative course. Indications and optimal techniques for TAC may differ between these populations. Level of Evidence: level IV - therapeutic, and level III - prognostic (C) 2016 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2eWyYHo
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Background To investigate the relationships between sagittal parameters and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores follo...
-
Objectives: To compare the performance of critical care providers with that of electroencephalography experts in identifying seizures using ...
-
Objectives: To describe the regionality and seasonality of respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospital and ICU admissions for 10 consecu...
-
Abstract Chronic exposure to high altitude may lead to hyperuricemia. We investigated the prevalence of hyperuricemia and its risk factors...
-
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death among trauma patients. Patients under antithrombotic therapy (ATT) carry an incre...
-
Abstract Background and Objective In England, the uptake of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillat...
-
Background Pulmonary contusion is a common injury that often results in priming for exaggerated inflammatory responses to a second hit. Prev...
-
ABSTRACTBackgroundEarly treatment with valproic acid (VPA) has demonstrated benefit in pre-clinical models of traumatic brain injury (TBI), ...
-
Annals of Vascular Surgery from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2oHXHVR
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου