Background: Temporary abdominal closure (TAC) following damage control surgery (DCS) for injured patients has been generalized to septic patients. However, direct comparisons between these populations are lacking. We hypothesized that patients with intra-abdominal sepsis would have different resuscitation requirements and lower primary fascial closure rates than trauma patients. Study Design: We performed a three year retrospective cohort analysis of patients managed with TAC for trauma (n=77) or intra-abdominal sepsis (n=147). All patients received negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) TAC with intention for planned relaparotomy and sequential abdominal closure attempts at 24-48 hour intervals. Results: At presentation, trauma patients had higher rates of hypothermia (31% vs. 18%), severe acidosis (27% vs. 14%), and coagulopathy (68% vs. 48%), and septic patients had higher vasopressor infusion rates (46% vs. 27%). Forty-eight hours after presentation, septic patients had persistently higher vasopressor infusion rates (37% vs. 17%), and trauma patients had received more red blood cell transfusions (6.0 vs. 0.0 units), fresh frozen plasma (5.0 vs. 0.0 units), and crystalloid (8,290 vs. 7,159 ml). Among patients surviving to discharge, trauma patients had higher primary fascial closure (PFC) rates (90% vs. 76%). For trauma patients, independent predictors of failure to achieve PCF were >=2.5 L NPWT output at 48 hours, >=10 L crystalloid administration at 48 hours, and >=10 U PRBC+FFP at 48 hours. For septic patients, relaparotomy within 48 hours predicted successful PFC; requirement for >=3 diagnostic/therapeutic laparotomies predicted failure to achieve PFC. Conclusions: Traumatic injury and intra-abdominal sepsis are associated with distinct pathophysiologic insults, resuscitation requirements, and outcomes. Failure to achieve primary fascial closure in trauma patients was attributable to the triad of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy; failure to achieve fascial closure in septic patients was dependent upon operative course. Indications and optimal techniques for TAC may differ between these populations. Level of Evidence: level IV - therapeutic, and level III - prognostic (C) 2016 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2eWyYHo
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis MDPI CancersCancers, Vol. 12, Pages 279: Metabolism of Estrogens: Turnover Differs Between Platinum-...
-
EDITORIAL Pediatric retina: A challenging yet fascinating field p. 179 Wei-Chi Wu DOI :10.4103/tjo.tjo_123_18 [HTML Full text] [PDF] ...
-
Abstract The aim of many breeding programs for the conservation of genetic biodiversity is to preserve the genetic resources of wild speci...
-
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Αλέξανδρος Γ. Σφακιανάκης Anaphylaxis Refractory to intra‐muscular adrenaline Anaphylaxis Refractory ...
-
Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis , Cancer ScienceMdm2 – open questionsAbstract The Mdm2 oncoprotein and its association with p53 were...
-
Helicobacter pylori infection and gastrointestinal tract cancer biology: considering a double-edged sword reflection Adult stem cells at wor...
-
# Medicine by Alexandros G. Sfakianakis,Anapafseos 5 Agios Nikolaos 72100 Crete Greece,00302841026182, High level MYC amplification in B-ce...
-
Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE,http://www.jove.com/ Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback... Journal of visualized experiments : J...
-
H2S can also protect nerve cells. The objective of the study is to investigate the effects of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) on the expressions of b...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου