Background There are no clear guidelines for the best test or combination of tests to identify traumatic rectal injuries. We hypothesize that computed tomography (CT) and rigid proctoscopy (RP) will identify all injuries. Methods American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional retrospective study (2004-2015) of patients who sustained a traumatic rectal injury. Patients with known rectal injuries who underwent both CT and RP as part of their diagnostic workup were included. Only patients with full thickness injuries (AAST grade II-V) were included. CT findings of rectal injury, perirectal stranding, or rectal wall thickening and RP findings of blood, mucosal abnormalities, or laceration were considered positive. Results 106 patients were identified. Mean age was 32 years, 85(79%) were male, and 67(63%) involved penetrating mechanisms. A total of 36 (34%) and 100 (94%) patients had positive CT and RP findings, respectively. Only 3 (3%) patients had both a negative CT and negative RP. On further review, each of these three patients had intraperitoneal injuries and had indirect evidence of rectal injury on CT scan including pneumoperitoneum or sacral fracture. Conclusion As stand-alone tests, neither CT nor RP can adequately identify traumatic rectal injuries. However, the combination of both test demonstrates a sensitivity of 97%. Intraperitoneal injuries may be missed by both CT and RP, so patients with a high index of suspicion and/or indirect evidence of rectal injury on CT scan may necessitate laparotomy for definitive diagnosis. Level of evidence IV, diagnostic Corresponding Author: Marc D. Trust MD, Clinical Instructor, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Seton Medical Center at The University of Texas at Austin, 1500 Red River St, Brackenridge Annex 301, Austin, TX 78701, Phone: (512) 324 – 8470, Fax: (512) 324 – 8471, mdtrust@ascension.org Presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Western Trauma Association, February 25th – March 2nd, 2018, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada. We have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose. © 2018 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2p3tQ9Z
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Morphology of the Middle Ear Ossicles in the Rodent Perimys (Neoepiblemidae) and a Comprehensive Anatomical... Morphology of the Middle Ear ...
-
The science behind successful learning, classroom teaching and clinical precepting in EMS from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://if...
-
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago News from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2awqX...
-
Abstract This Strategic Research Agenda identifies current challenges and needs in healthcare, illustrates how biomedical imaging and deri...
-
Acquiring the Skill of Identifying Fractions through the Virtual-Abstract Framework Abstract Fractions are an important component of mathema...
-
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide emerges as a therapeutic target in aging and ischemic conditions Abstract Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotid...
-
No abstract available from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2CpAhNR
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου