Background A federal assault weapons ban has been proposed as a way to reduce mass shootings in the U.S. (U.S). The Federal Assault Weapons Ban (A.W.B.) of 1994 made the manufacture and civilian use of a defined set of automatic and semi-automatic weapons and large capacity magazines illegal. The ban expired in 2004. The period from 1994 to 2004 serves as a single-arm pre-post observational study to assess the effectiveness of this policy intervention. Methods Mass shooting data for 1981 to 2017 were obtained from three well-documented, referenced, and open-source sets of data, based on media reports. We calculated the yearly rates of mass shooting fatalities as a proportion of total firearm homicide deaths and per U.S. population. We compared the 1994-2004 federal ban period to non-ban periods, using simple linear regression models for rates and a Poison model for counts with a year variable to control for trend. The relative effects of the ban period were estimated with odds ratios. Results Assault rifles accounted for 430 or 85.8% of the total 501 mass-shooting fatalities reported (95% CI 82.8, 88.9) in 44 mass-shooting incidents. Mass shootings in the U.S. accounted for an increasing proportion of all firearm-related homicides (coefficient for year = 0.7, p = 0.0003), with increment in year alone capturing over a third of the overall variance in the data (Adjusted R-squared = 0.3). In a linear regression model controlling for yearly trend, the federal ban period was associated with a statistically significant 9 fewer mass shooting related deaths per 10,000 firearm homicides (p = 0.03). Mass-shooting fatalities were 70% less likely to occur during the federal ban period (Relative Rate = 0.30, 95% CI 0.22,0.39). Conclusions Mass-shooting related homicides in the U.S. were reduced during the years of the federal assault weapons ban of 1994 to 2004. Study Type Observational Level of Evidence III/IV 77th Annual Meeting of AAST and 4th World Trauma Congress Sep 26 - 29, 2018 San Diego, California Corresponding Author: Charles DiMaggio, PhD, MPH, Professor of Surgery and Population Health, Director of Injury Research, Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, 462 First Avenue, NBV 15, New York, NY 10016-9196, Charles.DiMaggio@nyumc.org, Office: 212.263.3202, Mobile: 516.308.6426 Funding Statement: There are no federal or non-federal funding sources associated with this study. Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. © 2018 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2M2RnRl
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Introduction Over the last five years, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) has developed grading scales for Emergency ...
-
These concepts will yield more prepared, capable and resilient communities from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2PRIixV
-
Publication date: Available online 15 March 2018 Source: The Journal of Emergency Medicine Author(s): Eric J. Rebich, Stephanie S. Lee, J...
-
Objectives: To develop and validate an abbreviated version of the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire that can be used by patients as part of s...
-
Abstract Objectives To develop a patient decision aid to promote shared decision-making for stable, alert patients who present to the em...
-
Background: There has been little systematic examination of variation in pediatric burn care clinical practices and its effect on outcomes. ...
-
Background Hemostatic resuscitation principles have significantly changed adult trauma resuscitation over the past decade. Practice patterns...
-
Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of alcohol intoxication in trauma patients in regard to its...
-
Our co-hosts discuss the most helpful pieces of advice they received when starting their careers and what new industry personnel should know...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου