Publication date: Available online 24 July 2018
Source: The Journal of Emergency Medicine
Author(s): Vikas Shahi, Varun Shahi, William R. Mower
Abstract
Background
Serial hemoglobin measurement (ΔHgb) is intended to aid in the early identification of blunt trauma patients who have significant blood loss requiring intervention. However, the utility of ΔHgb has yet to be rigorously studied.
Objective
We sought to determine if ΔHgb is a reliable diagnostic tool in assessing blood loss in blunt trauma patients.
Methods
We enrolled consecutive blunt trauma patients ≥18 years of age who presented to a level I trauma center. We measured 2 hemoglobin levels spaced 5 min apart and calculated the difference (ΔHgb) for each patient. We also recorded whether each patient required any of the following interventions to treat their injuries: 1) operation or procedure to control hemorrhage; 2) radiographic embolization; 3) administration of blood and blood products; 4) administration of ≥3 liters of intravenous fluids; and 5) exsanguination. Our primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results
We enrolled 251 patients, including 192 males and 59 females with a mean age of 40 years. Interventions occurred in 56 patients and were withheld in 195. The median ΔHgb was −0.1 gm/dL (interquartile range −0.5 to 0.1 gm/dL) for patients requiring intervention and 0.0 gm/dL (interquartile range −0.6 to 0.3 gm/dL) for patients not requiring intervention. We found the area under the ROC curve to be 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.44–0.62).
Conclusions
Our results indicated that ΔHgb does not reliably distinguish between blunt trauma patients who require intervention and those who do not.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2Lit3PT
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου