Objective Emergency Departments and out-of-hours General Practitioner services collaborate increasingly in Urgent Care Collaborations (UCCs) by sharing one combined entrance and joint triage. The aim of this study is to examine the difference between UCCs and providers who operate separately with respect to the efficiency of patient flow. Methods This study had a cross-sectional observational design comparing three regions with UCC with three regions with usual care. Outcome measures were efficiency of patient flow, defined as a reducing length of stay (LOS), waiting time (WT) and the mean number of handovers. Data were obtained from electronic medical records. Results LOS (median 34:00 vs. 38:52 min) and WT (median 14:00 vs. 18:43 min) were statistically significantly longer in UCCs compared with usual care. This difference is mainly explained by the prolonged LOS and WT for consulting a General Practitioner. The mean number of interunit handovers was larger in UCCs. Conclusion The results indicate that, on average, UCCs do not enhance the efficiency of patient flow. The median LOS and WT are longer in UCCs and more handovers occur in UCCs compared with usual care.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2D36xmt
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Objectives Emergency departments (EDs) commonly analyze cases of patients returning within 72 hours of initial ED discharge as...
-
ORIGINAL ARTICLES Cone-beam computed tomography versus orthopantomography in sinus lift procedures: Two-dimensional versus three-dimension...
-
Haemovigilance programme of India: Comparative analysis of transfusion reactions reported over a 5-year period through two reporting formats...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου