Objective: Studies in sepsis are limited by heterogeneity regarding what constitutes suspicion of infection. We sought to compare potential suspicion criteria using antibiotic and culture order combinations in terms of patient characteristics and outcomes. We further sought to determine the impact of differing criteria on the accuracy of sepsis screening tools and early warning scores. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Academic center from November 2008 to January 2016. Patients: Hospitalized patients outside the ICU. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Six criteria were investigated: 1) any culture, 2) blood culture, 3) any culture plus IV antibiotics, 4) blood culture plus IV antibiotics, 5) any culture plus IV antibiotics for at least 4 of 7 days, and 6) blood culture plus IV antibiotics for at least 4 of 7 days. Accuracy of the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, the National and Modified Early Warning Score, and the electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage score were calculated for predicting ICU transfer or death within 48 hours of meeting suspicion criteria. A total of 53,849 patients met at least one infection criteria. Mortality increased from 3% for group 1 to 9% for group 6 and percentage meeting Angus sepsis criteria increased from 20% to 40%. Across all criteria, score discrimination was lowest for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.60) and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.62), intermediate for quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.65) and Modified Early Warning Score (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.67), and highest for National Early Warning Score (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.71) and electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.73). Conclusions: The choice of criteria to define a potentially infected population significantly impacts prevalence of mortality but has little impact on accuracy. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was the least predictive and electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage the most predictive regardless of how infection was defined. Copyright (C) by 2017 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2tFVzSH
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Zusammenfassung Albträume werden von vielen Menschen zumindest gelegentlich erlebt. Allerdings ist auch die Albtraumstörung, bei der Albtr...
-
Abstract Background and aims The clinical course and responsiveness to antiviral treatments differs among hepatitis B virus (HBV) genoty...
-
It’s up for debate whether the “best EMS movie” has actually been made yet. The Hollywood take on EMTs’ lives shows a much different picture...
-
In some episodes of Medic Mindset, Ginger Locke interviews paramedics who she affectionately calls the “medic-next-door.” Their stories are ...
-
Background: Physical activity has been linked to reduced risk of various cardiometabolic disease, cancer, and premature mortality. We invest...
-
BACKGROUND: This study extends what is known about long-term health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and other psychosocial outcomes (i.e., d...
-
Abstract Background Over 35 million alcohol impaired (AI) patients are cared for in Emergency Departments (EDs) annually. Emergency phys...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου