Objective: Studies in sepsis are limited by heterogeneity regarding what constitutes suspicion of infection. We sought to compare potential suspicion criteria using antibiotic and culture order combinations in terms of patient characteristics and outcomes. We further sought to determine the impact of differing criteria on the accuracy of sepsis screening tools and early warning scores. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Academic center from November 2008 to January 2016. Patients: Hospitalized patients outside the ICU. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Six criteria were investigated: 1) any culture, 2) blood culture, 3) any culture plus IV antibiotics, 4) blood culture plus IV antibiotics, 5) any culture plus IV antibiotics for at least 4 of 7 days, and 6) blood culture plus IV antibiotics for at least 4 of 7 days. Accuracy of the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, the National and Modified Early Warning Score, and the electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage score were calculated for predicting ICU transfer or death within 48 hours of meeting suspicion criteria. A total of 53,849 patients met at least one infection criteria. Mortality increased from 3% for group 1 to 9% for group 6 and percentage meeting Angus sepsis criteria increased from 20% to 40%. Across all criteria, score discrimination was lowest for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.60) and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.62), intermediate for quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.65) and Modified Early Warning Score (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.67), and highest for National Early Warning Score (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.71) and electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.73). Conclusions: The choice of criteria to define a potentially infected population significantly impacts prevalence of mortality but has little impact on accuracy. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was the least predictive and electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage the most predictive regardless of how infection was defined. Copyright (C) by 2017 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2tFVzSH
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Publication date: Available online 15 March 2018 Source: The Journal of Emergency Medicine Author(s): Eric J. Rebich, Stephanie S. Lee, J...
-
Background Hemostatic resuscitation principles have significantly changed adult trauma resuscitation over the past decade. Practice patterns...
-
Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of alcohol intoxication in trauma patients in regard to its...
-
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death among trauma patients. Patients under antithrombotic therapy (ATT) carry an incre...
-
Objectives: To review women’s participation as faculty at five critical care conferences over 7 years. Design: Retrospective analysis of fiv...
-
Objectives: To develop an acute kidney injury risk prediction model using electronic health record data for longitudinal use in hospitalized...
-
Introduction Over the last five years, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) has developed grading scales for Emergency ...
-
Abstract The flow of information between different regions of the cortex is fundamental for brain function. Researchers use causality dete...
-
We investigated the ability of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring to predict poor neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHC...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου