We thank the authors for this letter and appreciate the opportunity to respond to the comments and clarify our position. We agree with the authors in a number of their specific comments, and will attempt to address each of them. The first comment refers to the difference in video laryngoscopy devices and how “… pooling of results from studies evaluating performance of different VLs for prehospital intubation may lead to intrinsic inconsistencies in the primary endpoints.”
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2eTj4B7
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου