Introduction: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey is a data collection methodology for measuring a patient's perception of his/her hospital experience, and it has been selected by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as the validated and transparent national survey tool with publicly available results. Since 2012, hospital reimbursements rates have been linked to HCAHPS data based on patient satisfaction scores. The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess whether HCAHPS scores of Level-1 trauma centers correlate with actual hospital performance. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the latest publicly available HCAHPS data (2014 - 2015) was performed. American College of Surgeons (ACS) verified Level-I trauma centers for each state were identified from the ACS registry and then the following data points were collected for each hospital: HCAHPS linear mean scores regarding cleanliness of the hospital, doctor and nurse communication with the patient, staff responsiveness, pain management, overall hospital rating, and patient willingness to recommend the hospital. Our outcome measure were serious complication scores, failure-to-rescue (FTR) scores and readmission-after-discharge scores. Spearman correlation analysis was performed. Results: A total of 119 ACS verified Level-I trauma centers across 46 states were included. The median [IQR] overall hospital rating score for Level-I trauma centers was 89 [87-90]. The mean +/- SD score for serious complication was 0.96+/-0.266, FTR was 123.06+/-22.5, and readmission after discharge was 15.71+/-1.07. The Spearman correlation analysis showed that overall HCAHP-based hospital rating scores did not correlate with serious complications (correlation coefficient = 0.14 p= 0.125), FTR (correlation coefficient = -0.15 p= 0.073), or readmission after discharge (correlation coefficient = -0.18 p= 0.053). Conclusion: The findings of our study suggest that no correlation exists between HCAHPS patient satisfaction scores and hospital performance for Level-1 trauma centers. Consequently, the CMS should reconsider hospital reimbursement decisions based on HCAHP patient satisfaction scores. Level of Evidence: Retrospective Cohort Study, Level-III. (C) 2017 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2jOjgzN
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Visual impairment in kurdistan and trend of epidemiologic eye studies in Iran Per Kallestrup Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research 2019 ...
-
Abstract Purpose This study examined the effect of different knee flexion angles with a constant hip and knee torque on the muscle force...
-
It is estimated 2.75 billion people travel aboard commercial airlines every year and 44,000 in-flight medical emergencies occur worldwide ea...
-
Objectives: To compare the hemodynamic response in septic shock patients receiving vasopressin who were on chronic renin-angiotensin-aldoste...
-
In March 2005, eCore was the fortunate recipient of an article write up in JEMS magazine and web site about our products. Prior to re brandi...
-
Objectives: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requires hospitals to report compliance with a sepsis treatment bundle as part of...
-
The science behind successful learning, classroom teaching and clinical precepting in EMS from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://if...
-
A suspect is in custody after allegedly walking into the lunchroom at a Middletown, Ohio, school and opening fire. from EMS via xlomafota1...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου