INTRODUCTION: Little is known regarding health literacy among trauma patients. Anecdotal experience at our institution has suggested that a profound lack of understanding of basic healthcare information exists at some level in our patients after hospital discharge. The purpose of this study is to report the results of a pilot quality improvement project to determine trauma patient injury comprehension and how this impacts their overall satisfaction with care received. METHODS: Trauma patients were surveyed for knowledge of their injuries, operations, and satisfaction with their care at the first outpatient visit following hospital discharge from a level 1 trauma center. RESULTS: 175 surveys were distributed and 35 were returned complete and eligible for analysis. Average time from discharge to survey completion was 16 days. 75% of patients were male, and the mean age was 37. 56% of the injuries were from a blunt mechanism. 71% reported household income of less than $25,000 per annum, and 61% had an education level of high school diploma or less. 40% of patients were unable to correctly recall their injuries, and 54% were unable to correctly recall operations performed. 72% were unable to recall the name of any physician that provided care during their hospital stay. Nonetheless, 90% of patients were at least somewhat satisfied with their injury understanding, and only 3% felt that their level of understanding had a negative impact on their overall satisfaction with care received. There was no correlation between education or income level and ability to correctly recall injuries or operations. In addition, there was no correlation between ability to recall injuries or operations and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The observed deficiency in post-discharge health literacy among our patients is alarming, and demonstrates that current hospital discharge education is lacking. Although this deficit did not affect satisfaction with care, we feel a responsibility to improve the health literacy of our patients. The next step at our institution will be to implement a revised discharge education program followed by surveillance to evaluate for improvement. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic/care management study, level IV. (C) 2016 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1TPB5hr
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Big dreams to improve EMS with a windfall of funding for safety, health and wellness, research and leadership development from EMS via xlo...
-
As with many uncommon situations that are unique to critical illness, we cannot always rely on specialist consultation. Critical care prac...
-
Mitigate the effects a career in EMS can take to nurture your career longevity in EMS from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt...
-
Objectives: The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference developed a pediatric specific definition for acute respiratory distress s...
-
Objectives: To compare internal jugular vein and subclavian vein access for central venous catheterization in terms of success rate and comp...
-
Resuscitation is a System I Game... EMCrit by Scott Weingart . from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/1Svu...
-
Injury from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2atuoga
-
Background: The length of antimicrobial therapy in complicated intra-abdominal infections (CIAI) is controversial. A recent prospective, mul...
-
Consent and Autonomy in the Genomics Era Abstract Purpose of Review Genomic tests offer increased opportunity for diagnosis, but their outpu...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου