Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health problem leading many health care organizations to recommend universal screening as part of standard health care practice. Prior work shows that most IPV victims and perpetrators are unidentified by health care staff. We sought to enhance the capacity of an urban trauma center to identify IPV using a dual-method screening tool, and to establish prevalence of IPV victimization and perpetration among this population. Methods Patients aged 18 and over were recruited from a Level 1 Trauma Center from May 2015 to July 2017. Participants were assessed for IPV using a touch-screen tablet and then via face-to-face assessment. The data were used to determine feasibility of this dual-method and to establish prevalence of IPV in this sample. Results Of 586 eligible patients, 250 were successfully recruited for the study (43% response rate). Using the subscales of physical abuse, severe psychological abuse, and sexual coercion from the tablet-based CTS-2, 40% of women and 34% of men met criteria for IPV exposure in the past year and 35.6% of men and 50.6% of women met criteria using the face-to-face screen. In total, 102 patients (40.8%) screened positive using the dual method. Conclusion This study reports on a dual method to improve screening and identification of IPV in a Level 1 Trauma Center. Ultimately, the dual screening method identified more victims than either method on its own. Our findings provide evidence to standardize universal screening in our trauma center. Moving forward, we will link screening results to medical record data to identify predictors of patients’ current experiences of psychological and physical IPV. Our ultimate goal is to use these predictors to build a model for identifying patients who are at high risk for IPV victimization or perpetration. Level of Evidence Level III, Epidemiological; intimate partner violence; screening; trauma center Address correspondence to: Susan DiVietro, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Injury Prevention Center, 282 Washington Street, Hartford, CT 06106, sdivietro@connecticutchildrens.org, 860-837-5311. Funding Source: No external funding for this manuscript. Presentations: This paper will be presented as a Quickshot Presentation at the 76th Annual Meeting of AAST and Clinical Congress of Acute Care Surgery in Baltimore, MD. Financial Disclosure: The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. Conflict of Interest: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. © 2018 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2vsN4eZ
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Champion EMS is currently seeking a Communications Center Manager. Champion EMS is based out of Longview, Texas, serving the East Texas area...
-
from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2sbML2K
-
Remove ads BioMed Research International Validity and Reliability of the Polish Adaptation of the CHAMPS Physical Activity Questionnaire Th...
-
Abstract Objectives Emergency departments (EDs) commonly analyze cases of patients returning within 72 hours of initial ED discharge as...
-
Abstract Introduction In recent years, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising autologous biological treatment modality fo...
-
from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2sbML2K
-
from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2sbML2K
-
ORIGINAL ARTICLES Cone-beam computed tomography versus orthopantomography in sinus lift procedures: Two-dimensional versus three-dimension...
-
Haemovigilance programme of India: Comparative analysis of transfusion reactions reported over a 5-year period through two reporting formats...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου