Critical care fellowship training in the United States differs based on specific specialty, and includes medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, pediatrics, emergency medicine and neurocritical care training pathways. We provide an update regarding the number and growth of U.S. critical care fellowship training programs, on-duty residents and certified diplomates, and review the different critical care physician training pathways available to residents interested in pursuing a fellowship in critical care. Data were obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and specialty boards [American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), American Board of Surgery (ABS), American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA), American Board of Pediatrics (ABP), American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM)] and the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties (UCNS) for the last 16 years (2001-2017). The number of critical care fellowship training programs has increased 22.6%, with a 49.4% increase in the number of on-duty residents annually, over the last 16 years. This is in contrast to the period of 1995-2000 when the number of physicians enrolled in critical care fellowship programs had decreased or remained unchanged. Although more than 80 percent of intensivists in the U.S. train in internal medicine critical care ACGME-approved fellowships, there has been a significant increase in the number of residents from surgery, anesthesiology, pediatrics, emergency medicine and other specialties who complete specialty fellowship training and certification in critical care. Matriculation in neurocritical care fellowships is rapidly rising with 60 programs and over 1200 neurocritical care diplomates. Critical care is now an increasingly popular fellowship in all specialties. This rapid growth of all critical care specialties highlights the magnitude of the heterogeneity that will exist between intensivists in the future. Level of Evidence and Study Type Level I, Epidemiological Conficts of Interest and Source of Funding: none Corresponding Author: Lena M. Napolitano MD, FACS, FCCP, MCCM, Professor of Surgery, Director, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Division of Acute Care Surgery, [Trauma, Burns, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery], University of Michigan Health System, Room 1C340-UH, University Hospital, 1500 East Medical Drive, SPC 5033, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5033, E-mail: lenan@umich.edu © 2018 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2H4GM6u
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
These concepts will yield more prepared, capable and resilient communities from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2PRIixV
-
Objectives: To review women’s participation as faculty at five critical care conferences over 7 years. Design: Retrospective analysis of fiv...
-
Objectives: To develop and validate an abbreviated version of the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire that can be used by patients as part of s...
-
Publication date: Available online 15 March 2018 Source: The Journal of Emergency Medicine Author(s): Eric J. Rebich, Stephanie S. Lee, J...
-
Abstract Objectives To develop a patient decision aid to promote shared decision-making for stable, alert patients who present to the em...
-
Background: There has been little systematic examination of variation in pediatric burn care clinical practices and its effect on outcomes. ...
-
Background Hemostatic resuscitation principles have significantly changed adult trauma resuscitation over the past decade. Practice patterns...
-
Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of alcohol intoxication in trauma patients in regard to its...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου