Objectives: To describe the need for transfusion and short- and long-term evolutions of pediatric sickle cell disease patients with acute chest syndrome for whom early continuous noninvasive ventilation represented first-line treatment. Design: Single-center retrospective chart study in PICU. Setting: A tertiary and quaternary referral PICU. Patients: All sickle cell disease patients 5–20 years old admitted with confirmed acute chest syndrome and not transfused in the previous month were included. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Demographic data, laboratory and radiologic findings, transfusions, invasive ventilation, oxygen and noninvasive ventilation settings, duration of opioid treatment, length of hospital stay, and severe sickle cell disease complications in the ensuing 2 years were extracted from medical charts. Sixty-six acute chest syndrome in 48 patients were included. Continuous early noninvasive ventilation was well tolerated in 65 episodes, with positive expiratory pressure 4 cm H2O and pressure support 10 cm H2O (median) administered continuously, then discontinued during 7 days (median). No patient necessitated invasive ventilation or died. Twenty-three acute chest syndrome (35%) received transfusions; none received blood exchange. Transfused patients had more frequent upper lobe radiologic involvement, more severe anemia, higher reticulocyte counts, and higher C-reactive protein than nontransfused patients. Their evolution was more severe in terms of length of opioid requirement, length of noninvasive ventilation treatment, overall time on noninvasive ventilation, and length of stay. At 2-year follow-up after the acute chest syndrome episode, no difference was observed between the two groups. Conclusions: Early noninvasive ventilation combined with nonroutine transfusion is well tolerated in acute chest syndrome in children and may spare transfusion in some patients. Early recognition of patients still requiring transfusion is essential and warrants further studies. Dr. Brousse’s institution received funding from Addmedica, and she received funding from Novartis. Dr. de Montalembert’s institution received funding from Novartis, and she received funding from Addmedica. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest. For information regarding this article, E-mail: claire.heilbronner@nck.aphp.fr ©2018The Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2DSYlG5
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Champion EMS is currently seeking a Communications Center Manager. Champion EMS is based out of Longview, Texas, serving the East Texas area...
-
from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2sbML2K
-
The name of the second author of this article was incorrectly presented as "Riccardo Scarpa Cosimo" this should have been "Co...
-
Abstract Given shifting sex work criminalization and enforcement in Canada, this study examined worrying about workplace inspections by au...
-
Abstract Introduction In recent years, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising autologous biological treatment modality fo...
-
Abstract Background Permissive hypotensive resuscitation (PHR) is an advancing concept aiming towards deliberative balanced resuscitation ...
-
from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2sbML2K
-
While the psychiatric disorders are conditions frequently encountered in hospitalized patients, there are little or no data regarding the ch...
-
No abstract available from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2Tlj4K7
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου