Objectives: To describe the need for transfusion and short- and long-term evolutions of pediatric sickle cell disease patients with acute chest syndrome for whom early continuous noninvasive ventilation represented first-line treatment. Design: Single-center retrospective chart study in PICU. Setting: A tertiary and quaternary referral PICU. Patients: All sickle cell disease patients 5–20 years old admitted with confirmed acute chest syndrome and not transfused in the previous month were included. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Demographic data, laboratory and radiologic findings, transfusions, invasive ventilation, oxygen and noninvasive ventilation settings, duration of opioid treatment, length of hospital stay, and severe sickle cell disease complications in the ensuing 2 years were extracted from medical charts. Sixty-six acute chest syndrome in 48 patients were included. Continuous early noninvasive ventilation was well tolerated in 65 episodes, with positive expiratory pressure 4 cm H2O and pressure support 10 cm H2O (median) administered continuously, then discontinued during 7 days (median). No patient necessitated invasive ventilation or died. Twenty-three acute chest syndrome (35%) received transfusions; none received blood exchange. Transfused patients had more frequent upper lobe radiologic involvement, more severe anemia, higher reticulocyte counts, and higher C-reactive protein than nontransfused patients. Their evolution was more severe in terms of length of opioid requirement, length of noninvasive ventilation treatment, overall time on noninvasive ventilation, and length of stay. At 2-year follow-up after the acute chest syndrome episode, no difference was observed between the two groups. Conclusions: Early noninvasive ventilation combined with nonroutine transfusion is well tolerated in acute chest syndrome in children and may spare transfusion in some patients. Early recognition of patients still requiring transfusion is essential and warrants further studies. Dr. Brousse’s institution received funding from Addmedica, and she received funding from Novartis. Dr. de Montalembert’s institution received funding from Novartis, and she received funding from Addmedica. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest. For information regarding this article, E-mail: claire.heilbronner@nck.aphp.fr ©2018The Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2DSYlG5
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer, and its incidence is increasing. The first step in automated melanoma analysis of ...
-
Skillful use of BiPAP and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) can avoid intubation and improve outcomes. However, there isn't comprehensive ...
-
http://bit.ly/2DY4P7b
-
Weigh the pros and cons of partnering with a billing partner to maximize your revenue from EMS via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt...
-
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in severe burns and can lead to significantly poorer outcomes. Although the prognosis has...
-
Abstract Objective Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) following hybrid arch repair (HAR) is a lethal complication. Open surgical repair is ...
-
Abstract Target detection in the multiscale situation where there exit multiple ship targets with different sizes is a challenging task du...
-
Objectives: In various medical and surgical conditions, research has found that centers with higher patient volumes have better outcomes. Th...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου