Objectives: The outcomes of critically ill patients who undergo interhospital transfer are not well understood. Physicians assume that patients who undergo interhospital transfer will receive more advanced care that may translate into decreased morbidity or mortality relative to a similar patient who is not transferred. However, there is little empirical evidence to support this assumption. We examined country-level U.S. data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database to examine whether, in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis, interhospital transfer is associated with a mortality benefit. Design: Retrospective data analysis using complex survey design regression methods with propensity score matching. Setting: The Nationwide Readmissions Database contains information about hospital admissions from 22 States, accounting for roughly half of U.S. hospitalizations; the database contains linkage numbers so that admissions and transfers for the same patient can be linked across 1 year of follow-up. Patients: From the 2013 Nationwide Readmission Database Sample, 14,325,172 hospital admissions were analyzed. There were 61,493 patients with sepsis and on mechanical ventilation. Of these, 1,630 patients (2.7%) were transferred during their hospitalization. A propensity-matched cohort of 1,630 patients who did not undergo interhospital transfer was identified. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The exposure of interest was interhospital transfer to an acute care facility. The primary outcome was hospital mortality; the secondary outcome was hospital length of stay. The propensity score included age, gender, insurance coverage, do not resuscitate status, use of renal replacement therapy, presence of shock, and Elixhauser comorbidities index. After propensity matching, interhospital transfer was not associated with a difference in in-hospital mortality (12.3% interhospital transfer vs 12.7% non–interhospital transfer; p = 0.74). However, interhospital transfer was associated with a longer total hospital length of stay (12.8 d interquartile range, 7.7–21.6 for interhospital transfer vs 9.1 d interquartile range, 5.1–17.0 for non–interhospital transfer; p
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2yNS4LN
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract Purpose Early detection and improved treatment have increased lung cancer survival. Lung cancer survivors have more symptom dis...
-
C.A.T.I (Come and Take It) Armor sent us a few of their plates to check out, so we thought what the heck, lets torture the heck out of it. ...
-
Abstract Background and Objective Perianal fistulae are a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD) and pose a substantial burden ...
-
Academic Emergency Medicine, EarlyView. from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2JrZ72b
-
Randomized Trial on Comparison of the Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Dry Needling in Myofascial Trigger Points Objectives...
-
Santosh Kumar African Journal of Trauma 2015 4(2):60-62 Penetrating ocular trauma is an important cause of visual loss in children and y...
-
By Walter Dunbar Movies are made for entertainment; documentaries are designed to educate. HBO's new documentary film "Marathon: T...
-
SALT LAKE CITY — The increasing rate of opioid overdose deaths shows the traditional EMS response to an opioid overdose patient of respond, ...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου