Background: Temporary abdominal closure (TAC) following damage control surgery (DCS) for injured patients has been generalized to septic patients. However, direct comparisons between these populations are lacking. We hypothesized that patients with intra-abdominal sepsis would have different resuscitation requirements and lower primary fascial closure rates than trauma patients. Study Design: We performed a three year retrospective cohort analysis of patients managed with TAC for trauma (n=77) or intra-abdominal sepsis (n=147). All patients received negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) TAC with intention for planned relaparotomy and sequential abdominal closure attempts at 24-48 hour intervals. Results: At presentation, trauma patients had higher rates of hypothermia (31% vs. 18%), severe acidosis (27% vs. 14%), and coagulopathy (68% vs. 48%), and septic patients had higher vasopressor infusion rates (46% vs. 27%). Forty-eight hours after presentation, septic patients had persistently higher vasopressor infusion rates (37% vs. 17%), and trauma patients had received more red blood cell transfusions (6.0 vs. 0.0 units), fresh frozen plasma (5.0 vs. 0.0 units), and crystalloid (8,290 vs. 7,159 ml). Among patients surviving to discharge, trauma patients had higher primary fascial closure (PFC) rates (90% vs. 76%). For trauma patients, independent predictors of failure to achieve PCF were >=2.5 L NPWT output at 48 hours, >=10 L crystalloid administration at 48 hours, and >=10 U PRBC+FFP at 48 hours. For septic patients, relaparotomy within 48 hours predicted successful PFC; requirement for >=3 diagnostic/therapeutic laparotomies predicted failure to achieve PFC. Conclusions: Traumatic injury and intra-abdominal sepsis are associated with distinct pathophysiologic insults, resuscitation requirements, and outcomes. Failure to achieve primary fascial closure in trauma patients was attributable to the triad of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy; failure to achieve fascial closure in septic patients was dependent upon operative course. Indications and optimal techniques for TAC may differ between these populations. Level of Evidence: level IV - therapeutic, and level III - prognostic (C) 2016 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2eWyYHo
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Academic Emergency Medicine, EarlyView. from Emergency Medicine via xlomafota13 on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2JxJINK
-
Abstract Purpose Early detection and improved treatment have increased lung cancer survival. Lung cancer survivors have more symptom dis...
-
Publication date: February 2017 Source: The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Volume 52, Issue 2 Author(s): Chelsea McCullough from Emer...
-
Objectives: Impaired cerebral autoregulation following neurologic injury is a predictor of poor clinical outcome. We aimed to assess the rel...
-
LAS VEGAS — With the release of their new First Response Vest, Safe Life Defense has solidified as the brand specifically for EMS. Based on ...
-
OBJECTIVE: Trauma-related deaths remain an important public health problem. One group susceptible to death due to traumatic mechanisms is U....
-
The relationship between presbycusis and vestibular activity Gehan M S. Abd El-Salam Journal of Medicine in Scientific Research 2018 1(4):24...
-
By EMS1 Staff DETROIT — Two EMTs were praised for saving nine people from a suspicious house fire Tuesday. EMTs Brian Schimanski and Chri...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου